King Arthur…3.5

It was decent. I mean, every war movie follows a template. Hero who is trying to find inner self. Aragorn- king of men. Achillies- why does he kill? Arthur- is Rome really for freedom? cool fight scene at the beginning. Fellowship- the flashback battle. Troy- Where Achillies OWNS that guy- some no name. King Arthur- fight to save bishop. And then theres the big fight scene at the end, followed by closure, the moving speech by the main character, and leading lady who influences the main character, and a death for good measure. So, seeing as this was a war movie, and it followed all those things, +1 for following the by laws, -1 for no originality. Its a tail of fellowship, and doing whats right. Like i said, decent. Historically Accurate? Got me. Prob not. If you know, let me know. IS it worth seeing? Yeah Sure- Kiera Knightly is in it. O yeah, the Saxton Leader. Here is the casting convo:
Man 1: “Hey, for this guy, lets find a huge guy, who sucks at acting, who is not steven segaul.”
Man 2: “And a texas accent for good measure.”
Thats it im done- go see it if you want- its preet much what I expected. Later